Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áßø ºÒÀÏÄ¡ Æò°¡±âÁØÀ¸·Î¼­ÀÇ °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ °èÁ¶µµ Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷ ¿¬±¸

The Study of Standard Deviation of Gray Scale Histogram in Digital Subtraction Radiography as a Test Parameter for Superimposition Error

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1999³â 29±Ç 2È£ p.417 ~ 422
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶ºÀÇý/Bong Hae Cho

Abstract

¼­·Ð
°è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀº ÇغÎÇÐÀû ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ÀÜ»óÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÏ¿© µÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ Â÷À̸¸À» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â
¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ½Ã°£°æ°ú¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹Ì¼¼ÇÑ °ñ º¯È­¸¦ ÆǺ°Çϴµ¥ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿© Ä¡Á¶°ñÀÇ Æò°¡¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÏ
´Ù. °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ ÁúÀº µÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ ±âÇÏÇÐÀû ¹× ´ëÁ¶µµÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÈ­¿Í Áßø½ÃÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡
Á¤µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© °áÁ¤µÈ´Ù. °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ Æò°¡´Â ¿µ»óÀÇ ÁÖ°üÀû Æǵ¶¿¡ ÀÇÇϰųª, °´°üÀûÀÎ
¼öÇÐÀû ±âÁØ¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¿Ô´Âµ¥, °èÁ¶µµÀÇ Àý´ë Â÷³ª Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷ ȤÀº ÀÌ µÑ ¸ðµÎ, °øÁ¦
¿µ»ó(difference image)ÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷, Â÷À̱â´ÉÀÇ ¿§Áö(Edges of the difference function) ¹×
°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ È÷½ºÅä±×·¥±â´ÉÀÇ ¿£Æ®·ÎÇÇ(entropy of the histogram function of the difference
image)µîÀÌ ¿©±â¿¡ ¼ÓÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ Áß µÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ ºÒÀÏÄ¡µµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â À¯»ç¼º Æò°¡
(similarity measure)¿¡ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëµÈ °ÍÀº °èÁ¶µµÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷·Î, Ludlowµî°ú Sanderµî
Àº ±âÇÏÇÐÀû ÀçÇö¼ºÀ» À§ÇÑ °íÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀ», Ruttimann µîÀº ´ëÁ¶µµÀÇ ¼öÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´
°í, WenzelµîÀº µÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ Áßø¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦, AagaardµîÀº ÀνÄÁ¡ ¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥
Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Wenzel µîÀº °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±¸Á¶ÀÜ»ó
À» Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÌ Ãʱ⠰ñº¯È­¸¦ Æǵ¶Çϴµ¥ ¿ì¼öÇÔ¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í X-¼±°ü¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±¤Àڹ߻ý
º¯µ¿, ÃÔ¿µÀ§Ä¡ º¯È­, Çö»óÁ¶°Ç º¯È­, »ó ȹµæ(image capture)½ÃÀÇ Çʸ§À§Ä¡ º¯È­ µî µÎ ¹æ
»ç¼±»çÁø»çÀÌÀÇ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀÎ Â÷ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀûÀÎ °áÇÔÀ» ÇÇÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î °¢ °úÁ¤¿¡
¼­ÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû ÀÜ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ ¾øÀÌ´Â °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ Á¤È®ÇÑ Æǵ¶Àº ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù.
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº µÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀÇ Áßø½Ã ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ºÒÀÏÄ¡µµ¸¦ °è¼ö°øÁ¦¿µ»óÀÇ °èÁ¶µµÀÇ
Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷°¡ ¾ó¸¶³ª Á¤È®È÷ ¹Ý¿µÇϴ°¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ¾î¶² Áßø ºÎÁ¶È­°¡ »óÀÇ Áú¿¡ °¡Àå ¸¹
Àº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â°¡ ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : The aim of this study was to assess the validity of standard deviation of
gray scale histogram in digital subtraction radiography as a test parameter for
superimposition error.
Materials and Methods : Twenty periapical radiographs were used as baseline images
and they were copied to exclude the influence of exposure geomety and contrast
differences. These subsequent images were linearly displaced by 0.1-0.5 §® in the x-, y-
and xy-directions, rotated by 0.5-3¡Æ and distorted by angular contraction of 1-5¡Æ in
x- and y-axis before subtraction. The standard deviations of gray levels in the
subtraction images were obtained and paired t-tests were performed. Pearson correlation
coefficients(r) were calculated between the standard deviations and the superimposition
errors.
Results : Linear displacement showed high correlation coefficients of 0.997, 0.997 and
0.995 in x-, y- and xy-axis respectively. Statistically significant different standard
deviation existed among all linearly displaced groups(p<0.05). Distortion showed
relatively low correlation coefficients of 0.982 and 0.959 in x- and y-axis. The standard
deviations between the two distortion groups were statistically significant
different(p<0.05).
Conclusion : Standard deviation of gray level distribution in digital subtraction images
is satisfactory but not perfect similarity measure to assess the superimposition errors.

Å°¿öµå

radiography; dental; digital subtraction; computer-assisted; periodontal;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸